From the JEC Blog

Posts Tagged ‘beauty’

Sweeney’s Booknotes: Jonathan Edwards and Reformed Spirituality

Belden C. Lane, Ravished by Beauty: The Surprising Legacy of Reformed Spirituality (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).

I delighted in this essay. Belden Lane, a Presbyterian and graduate of Fuller, teaches theology and American religion with the Jesuits of St. Louis University. He devotes the bulk of his time to mining the history of theology for sources of ecological and moral inspiration. In this book, the culmination of many years of painful struggle to come to terms with the ethos of Reformed Christianity, he pursues what he refers to as “a historical, theological, ethical, and even liturgical agenda . . . . to articulate a spirituality of desire in the history of the Reformed tradition, asking how major figures from John Calvin to Jonathan Edwards have emphasized the beauty of the world as a way of contemplating the beauty of God” (p. 13).

The Reformed tradition is not well-known for its aesthetic sensibility. It has received far more attention for its allegedly distant, cold, predestinarian doctrine of God, stern approach to the moral life, and dim view of worldly beauty. However, in Lane’s earthy hands, Reformed Protestantism brims with love for the world, indeed the cosmos, as the theater of God’s glory, goading readers to groan deeply for its coming restoration and to care, in the mean time, for its creatures.

His chapters on Edwards build on the work of Roland Delattre and Sang Hyun Lee to argue, not that Edwards himself worked as an eco-theologian, but that Edwards’ doctrine of God and theology of beauty can inspire and make good sense of environmental ethics today. “The physical universe,” for Edwards, is “a mirror of God’s glory, participating in what it reflects. The world is not simply a thin veil through which we reach toward a God wholly beyond it. For Edwards, nature—in all of its sensory palpability—is itself taken up into the still more sensuous glory of God. In the process, it teaches us desire, opening its mysteries to all who have received a new sense for the perceiving and extending of beauty in their common life” (pp. 199-200).

Or as Lane concludes in a chapter on what he has taken from Edwards’ ethics, “Jonathan Edwards . . . was a man for whom God was a constant amazement, a man for whom angels were ultimately more real than carriage bolts. But he never dismissed the tactile world of carriage bolts and harnesses, quill pens and mint sprigs as unimportant. He simply knew that reality, at its deepest level, is more than mere ‘stuff.’ It’s a matter of intimate relationships initiated by a communicative God. A purely material, non-relational world (like that of Thomas Hobbes) could never be ‘real’ for him. Yet the closest he came to imagining God’s ideal Beauty was by attending to the endless array of nature’s interrelationships. He loved the world because of the access it offered him to God, but he loved it nonetheless” (p. 210).

Historians may cringe from time to time in Lane’s story. He harbors “a love-hate relationship” with Reformed spirituality (p. 57). A recovering fundamentalist (a status he describes at numerous points throughout the book), he seeks to compensate for the harshness of his boyhood Calvinism by construing his tradition in a much more liberal way. He mines it for things he finds retrievable, discarding and even attempting to destroy what he dislikes (not an eco-friendly method). He is honest and open about this. In the end, though, it yields a rather attenuated Calvinism pruned for present purposes more than a panoramic picture of the Reformed spiritual landscape (in all its biodiversity).

As Lane suggests in a typical moment of spiritual profundity, “It isn’t the mastery of truth, but a relentless longing for it that qualifies those who become trusted guides for others” (p. 1). He misleads from time to time. But in the main, Lane has proven himself to be a trusted guide for those who long for the whole world to magnify the glory of God.

–By Douglas Sweeney, Director of the JEC at TEDS

Marsden on Edwards and Beauty

George Marsden is the Francis A. McAnaney Professor of History Emeritus at University of Notre Dame and he gave the first lecture in the “Jonathan Edwards and the Church” series (cosponsored with the Henry Center for Theological Understanding). In his lecture, he set the stage with a picture of Benjamin Franklin’s modernity as it was deeply shaped by emerging enlightenment and modern trends. Against this backdrop, his contemporary Jonathan Edwards posed a sharp contrast, the last of the Puritan theologians responding in his own way to a changing world, which Marsden fleshed out as a Edwards’s brilliant ‘theology of active beauty.’ Colin Smith, the pastor of the Orchard Evangelical Free Church, probed in response to Dr. Marsden’s lecture how pastors can help people move from the religion of Franklin to the faith of Edwards. The exchange between these two men was very stimulating to all in attendance.


A free audio and video of this lecture will be available soon.

Jonathan Edwards and the Church: Opening Lecture by George Marsden

The Jonathan Edwards Center at TEDS is pleased to announce its first lecture in the “Jonathan Edwards and the Church” series. George Marsden, Francis A. McAnaney Professor of History Emeritus at University of Notre Dame, will be giving a lecture on Edwards and beauty.

The lecture will be on November 3, 2010 at 1pm at the ATO chapel on the campus of TEDS; it is free and all are welcome.

Pastor Colin Smith of the Orchard Evangelical Free Church (Arlington Heights, IL) will be responding to Dr. Marsden’s lecture.

This lecture series is co-sponsored with the Henry Center for Theological Understanding.

Jonathan Edwards for the Twenty-first Century

Abstract: What are the most helpful insights that we can gain from Jonathan Edwards’s theology today? This lecture uses the contrast between Benjamin Franklin and Jonathan Edwards in the eighteenth century to reflect on some of the most characteristic traits of later American culture to which Edwards’s “theology of active beauty” provides particularly helpful alternatives.