From the JEC Blog

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Northampton Edwards conference: “Jonathan Edwards: An American Apocalyptic Prophet”

John Martin, The Last Judgement

John Martin, The Last Judgement

Jonathan Edwards is an apocalyptic prophet, not so much as a prognosticator but as a revealer of what lies hidden.  Edwards discerned the trends of events of his own time and place and viewed them sub specie aeternitatis.  Since then some of these trends have gathered momentum and come to fruition in our own day.  The framework of Edwards’ world-view is radically eschatological.  He interprets the course of human and natural events as tending inexorably towards a future denouement in the form of the establishment of God’s postmillennial kingdom on earth.  His conceptions of history and nature are teleological.  Edwards conceives of history as a divine comedy.  Though history has its periodic tragic regressions when its wheels seem to turn backwards, its overreaching arc is towards a postmillennial denouement.  The locus classicus of Edwards’ eschatology, together with its attendant philosophy of history, is his History of the Work of Redemption, an updating of Augustine’s City of the God. This was to be a new kind of divinity written in an historical key.  It would have been Edwards’ theological summa had it not remained unfinished at his death.  Edwards’ postmillennialism lodged in the American psyche and took a secular turn in the nineteenth century when it gave rise to fictional utopias (Bellamy’s Looking Backward) and dystopias (Hawthorne’s Blithedale Romance) as well as utopian social experiments like Brookfarm.

As might be expected of one who took the bird’s-eye view of history and discerned deeper historical trends, Edwards pronounced jeremiads on his own social-political milieu with its emergent mercantile economy based upon the unregulated pursuit of self-interest.  He diagnosed this cultural malaise as a symptom of Arminianism which in all its forms he strenuously opposed throughout his life.  He understood that forms of self-determination, individually and collectively, which were not consonant with the will of God or an expression of disinterested benevolence to general being are nothing less than demonic and doomed.  On one reading (Alan Heimert’s) Edwards, as a fomenter of the Great Awakening that prepared the way for the American Revolution, is a prophet of the American capitalist-republican polity.  On an alternative reading he is more rightly regarded as an American Jonah who stands in stark judgment on the American cult of self-reliance (Arminianism again) as represented paradigmatically by Edwards’ contemporary and nemesis, Benjamin Franklin; indeed, Franklin had the victory over the American mind.

The focus of this conference is the light that Edwards sheds on contemporary social, political and economic movements.  The conference will consider which of these Edwards would have approved and those he would not have.  In brief, the purpose of this conference hopes to bring an Edwardsean perspective on, among other things, the many conflicts that have riven contemporary society, the crises that seem endemic to it, but also those things boding well for the future.  This perspective need not be narrowly sectarian.  The conference encourages applying the spirit, if not the letter, of Edwards to interpreting the present age.

Papers need not be confined to Edwards alone.  They may be concerned with other, later thinkers or even your own reflections on these matters.  The only criterion is that the papers be informed by an Edwardsean perspective broadly conceived.

SOME SUGGESTED TOPICS:

  • Edwards’ eschatology and philosophy of history
  • Edwards’ eschatology in its historical context
  • Arminianism
  • American utopian and dystopian literature
  • Utopian social experiments
  • The social, political, and economic context of Edwards’ thought
  • Contemporary cultural trends in light of Edwards’ eschatology and ethics.

Please e-mail your papers or abstracts to me in Microsoft Word format no later than September 1st, 2013.  The papers should be geared to a reading time of 20 to 30 minutes.

DATE:  Thursday, October 3rd through Saturday, October 5th, 2013

LOCATION:  The First Churches, Northampton, Massachusetts

Sweeney’s Booknotes: Remembering Sarah Osborn

Catherine Brekus, Sarah Osborn's WorldCatherine A. Brekus, Sarah Osborn’s World: The Rise of Evangelical Christianity in Early America, New Directions in Narrative History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013).

Newport, Rhode Island’s Sarah Osborn (1714-1796) has long been known as a lay Edwardsean Christian leader during and after the Great Awakening in New England. But not until now has she enjoyed the sort of critical acclaim that is commensurate with her historical significance.

In this latest of her books on early American Christian women—such as the landmark Strangers & Pilgrims: Female Preaching in America, 1740-1845 (1998)—Catherine Brekus, a member of our Center’s Board of Visitors who teaches at the University of Chicago Divinity School, offers a sympathetic narrative of Osborn’s life and ministry that is clearly the best treatment of the subject ever written.

Born in London to a Congregationalist tanner and his wife, Sarah Haggar moved to Newport with her family in 1730. While still a young girl, she married a sailor, Samuel Wheaten, in 1731 (against the wishes of her parents) and had a son named Samuel in 1732 (who died young, at age 11, in 1744). Husband Samuel died at sea only two years after their marriage (1733), while Sarah was still a teen. Several years later (1742), she would remarry, but this time to a widower with three boys of his own, Henry Osborn, a tailor, who was more than twice her age.

Sarah lived a fruitful life as a teacher, the mistress of a local boarding school, and a lay leader of Newport’s First Congregational Church. She led a large women’s prayer group. She founded several Bible studies. Most famously, perhaps, she led a ministry to slaves and free blacks in the region. (She owned a slave herself and was something of a racist, but had a passion for gospel ministry with Africans.) These efforts hit their peak during the mid-1760s when she supervised a startling revival from her home. “The numbers who crossed Sarah Osborn’s threshold each week were astonishing,” writes Brekus. “During the summer of 1766 more than 500 people crowded into her house every week, including almost 140 on Sunday nights alone. . . . By January 1767, 525 people were coming to her house every week, including at least 70 Africans. Remarkably, more than 5 percent of Newport’s black population passed through her doors every Sunday evening” (pp. 254, 260).

Even after this revival, Osborn’s ministry continued and exerted striking influence in Newport and beyond. Osborn’s women’s group, in fact, took the lead in the appointment of Edwards’ student, Samuel Hopkins, to the pastorate of their church in 1770. (This happened behind the scenes. Only men in the church could vote. But the ladies in Sarah’s charge persuaded their husbands of Hopkins’ merits over much initial skepticism.)

Hopkins and Osborn grew close. Hopkins assumed primary leadership of most of Osborn’s meetings. But as he did, he consulted her and other women for help (most significantly Susanna Anthony, a close friend of Osborn and supporter of Hopkins’ ministry). Hopkins persuaded many women to oppose the slave trade—no mean feat in a seaport town that found this trade extremely lucrative. He pushed the New Divinity, divisively, in town. (Ezra Stiles served the Second Church untill 1776, gently opposing Hopkins’ views.) And when Sarah and Susanna (known as “Susa”) passed away, he published their memoirs, canonizing them for later evangelicals.

Brekus’s research is based largely on Sarah’s own writings: her memoir, ten volumes of her diaries, over a hundred letters, and a short tract, The Nature, Certainty, and Evidence of True Christianity (1755). But it has also involved extensive use of Hopkins’ Memoirs of the Life of Mrs. Sarah Osborn; Elizabeth West Hopkins’ Familiar Letters, Written by Mrs. Sarah Osborn and Miss Susanna Anthony; and a cache of other primary materials: diaries, conversion accounts, sermons, church records, periodicals, treatises, etc. What a treasure.

This book is a great read. It whets my appetite for the volume of Osborn’s diaries that Brekus is now editing for Yale University Press.

Sweeney’s Booknotes: Jonathan Edwards on God and Creation

oliver-crisp_god-and-creation_coverOliver D. Crisp, Jonathan Edwards on God and Creation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012)

This is one of the most important books written on Jonathan Edwards by a constructive, philosophical theologian.

Oliver is a friend. We published a book together last summer. I am biased in his favor. Nevertheless, I speak the truth. He is a brilliant theologian and a fascinating conversation partner, sometimes even a vigorous sparring partner, with Edwards.

As Crisp makes clear at the beginning of the book, it is not an effort in history. It is not aimed primarily at understanding Edwards in relation to his context, but in dialoguing with Edwards on his view of God and the world: “this is not a study in the history of ideas or in historical theology. It is an account of Edwards’s philosophical theology cast in the collegial mode, where we shall be concerned not only to understand what Edwards says but also to engage him on the issues he considers, with a view to ascertaining whether or not the views he expressed are coherent” (p. 3).

Some of the time, Crisp concludes that Edwards’ views do cohere. At other times, he says, they do not. However, even where Crisp believes that Edwards’ thinking was confused, he works to iron out and engage his subject’s metaphysical musings in a respectful, constructive, and edifying manner.

No one will like everything the author does with Edwards. In eight short chapters, fewer than 200 pages, he engages Edwards’ ontology (chapter one), his views of God’s nature (chapter two), God’s freedom (chapter three), God’s aseity (chapter four), and even God’s excellency (chapter five), his doctrine of the Trinity (chapter six), his alleged panentheism (chapter seven) and view of the consummation of human history in heaven and hell (chapter eight). Along the way, Crisp depicts his famous subject as an occasionalist (a depiction used to account for most of the things Crisp dislikes in Edwards’ view of God and the world); a pure-act theist whose thinking militates against the dispositional ontology that Sang Lee attributed to Edwards and his God (Crisp assumes—I think falsely—that a dispositional God cannot be fully actualized); a full-bore Neoplatonist; a thoroughgoing idealist; a proponent of theosis; a panentheist; and one whose logic of reprobation might be used to teach a form of universalism. Crisp levels major claims but that, of course, is part of his charm.

All of us should be grateful for this erudite, charitable, constructive engagement with Edwards, whose theology did verge at times on idiosyncrasies that can be difficult to fathom. Crisp’s book will not appeal to those impatient with speculation about God and God’s relation to the universe. But for those who love to think about the deep things of God, it offers a feast of food for thought. Highly recommended.

Oliver Crisp Rescheduled

Headshot, Oliver CrispDear friends of the JEC,

Oliver Crisp’s upcoming visit has been rescheduled.

Originally planning to visit the Trinity community next week (September 26-27) to lecture in both Jonathan Edwards and the Church and New Directions in Edwards Studies lecture series, health complications have postponed his visit. The new date has been set for April 17-18.

Please pray for Oliver and his family as he heals from back surgery.

Blessings in Christ,

Geoffrey Fulkerson

Associate Director